Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668765›Full record

Observational studyEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2024

Nuvaxovid NVX-CoV2373 vaccine safety profile: real-world data evidence after 100,000 doses, Australia, 2022 to 2023.

Hazel J Clothier, Claire Parker, John H Mallard, Paul Effler, Lauren Bloomfield, Dale Carcione, Jim P Buttery

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hazel J ClothierEpi-Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Melbourne, Australia.
Claire ParkerCommunicable Disease Control Directorate, Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, Australia.
John H MallardEpi-Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul EfflerCommunicable Disease Control Directorate, Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, Australia.
Lauren BloomfieldCommunicable Disease Control Directorate, Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, Australia.
Dale CarcioneCommunicable Disease Control Directorate, Western Australia Department of Health, Perth, Australia.
Jim P ButteryEpi-Informatics, Centre for Health Analytics, Melbourne Children's Campus, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionNuvaxovid became available in Australia from February 2022, a year after the first COVID-19 vaccines. This protein-based vaccine was an alternative for people who had had an adverse event to and/or were hesitant to receive an mRNA or adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine. Although safety from clinical trials was reassuring, small trial populations, low administration rates and limited post-licensure intelligence meant potential rare adverse events were underinformed.AimWe aimed to describe Nuvaxovid's safety profile in a real-world setting.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational analysis of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) spontaneously reported to SAFEVAC, the integrated vaccine safety surveillance system in Victoria and Western Australia. Reports from 14 February 2022 to 30 June 2023 were analysed by vaccinee demographics, reported reactions and COVID-19 vaccine dose, and compared as reporting rates (RR) per 100,000 doses administered.ResultsWe received 356 AEFI reports, following 102,946 Nuvaxovid doses administered. Rates were higher after dose 1 than dose 2 (rate ratio: 1.5, p = 0.0008), primary series than booster (rate ratio: 2.4, p < 0.0001), and in females vs males (rate ratio: 1.4, p = 0.004). Clinically confirmed serious AEFI included 94 cases of chest pain (RR = 91.3), two myocarditis (RR = 1.9) and 20 pericarditis (RR = 19.4). Guillain-Barré syndrome or thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndromes were not reported, nor deaths attributable to vaccination.ConclusionSAFEVAC's collaborative data model enabled pooling of clinically reviewed data across jurisdictions, increasing the safety profile evidence for Nuvaxovid and improving the odds for identification and description of rare events. This analysis affirmed the safety profile of Nuvaxovid.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinesadverse eventsimmunisation, COVID, Nuvaxovid, myocarditis, pericarditissurveillanceVaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID39668765
PMCPMC11650513

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.