Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39668944›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024

Biofortification: Future Challenges for a Newly Emerging Technology to Improve Nutrition Security Sustainably.

Howarth Bouis, Jennifer Foley, Keith Lividini, Jaya Jumrani, Russell Reinke, Dominique Van Der Straeten, Ronan Zagado, Erick Boy, Lynn R Brown, Bho Mudyahoto and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Unlocking the potential of rice bean (Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Selenium biofortification: integrating one health and sustainability.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biofortification of kale with vitamin BCurrent research in food science · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Further studies on pyramiding of alien genes for high grain Fe and Zn in bread wheat.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Howarth BouisInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Jennifer FoleyHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Keith LividiniMicronutrient Forum, Washington, DC.
Jaya JumraniICAR - National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP), New Delhi, India.
Russell ReinkeInternational Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Dominique Van Der StraetenLaboratory of Functional Plant Biology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ronan ZagadoPhilippine Rice Research Institute, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.
Erick BoyHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Lynn R BrownHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Bho MudyahotoHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Richard AliomaHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Munawar HussainHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Wolfgang H PfeifferHarvestPlus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofortification was coined as a term to define a plant breeding strategy to increase the micronutrient content of staple food crops to reduce the burden of micronutrient deficiencies in low- and middle-income countries. In 2003, the HarvestPlus program, based in the centers comprising the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, was initiated to implement the biofortification strategy. This article discusses what has been achieved, what has been learned, and the key challenges to embed biofortification in food systems and to expand its impact. Cost-effectiveness is key to the biofortification strategy. Biofortification piggybacks on the agronomically superior varieties being developed at agricultural research centers. Central plant breeding research discoveries can be spread globally. Farmers have every motivation to adopt the latest high-yielding, high profit crops. High productivity leads to lower food prices. As a consequence, consumers can increase their mineral and vitamin intakes at no additional cost by substituting biofortified staple foods 1-for-1 for nonbiofortified staple foods. After 20 years of investment, biofortified staple food crops are being produced by farmers in over 40 countries and are eaten by hundreds of millions of people. Published nutrition trials have shown nutrient-rich crops to be efficacious. The biofortification strategy is now recognized by the international nutrition community as one effective approach among several interventions needed to reduce micronutrient deficiencies. This is a promising beginning. However, biofortification is still a newly emerging technology. A limitation of biofortification as implemented to date is that densities of single nutrients have been increased in given staple food crops. To reach a higher trajectory, the impacts of biofortification can be multiplied several-fold using genetic engineering and other advanced crop development techniques to combine multiple-nutrient densities with climate-smart traits.

Indexed as

agricultural researchbiofortificationcost-effectivenessfood staplesmalnutritionmicronutrientsnutrition security

Identifiers

PMID39668944
PMCPMC11635736

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.