ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024
Biofortification: Future Challenges for a Newly Emerging Technology to Improve Nutrition Security Sustainably.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maize Biofortification Approaches for Fighting Malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Unlocking the potential of rice bean (Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2026Article
- Preventive and Ameliorative Effects of Se- and Zn-Biofortified Chickpeas on MAFLD-Related Metabolic Disturbances.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Pilot deployment of beta carotene-enriched rice (Golden Rice) in the Philippines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nutraceutical Interventions in Stunting: Advances, Challenges, and Prospects.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Selenium biofortification: integrating one health and sustainability.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Review
- Are Alternative Crops Needed for Future Sustainable Food Production?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Estimating the Number of People Eating Biofortified Foods On-Farm and from Markets: a Detailed Methodology and Tool.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Reframing sorghum biofortification: multi-trait nutritional dissection of Sudanese wild germplasm reveals extractability-driven breeding targets.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Biofortification of kale with vitamin BCurrent research in food science · 2026Article
- Dietary approaches to support cognition in older adults: a systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- The Antagonistic Influence of Phytic Acid on Zinc Absorption: AnNutrients · 2025Article
- Further studies on pyramiding of alien genes for high grain Fe and Zn in bread wheat.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofortification was coined as a term to define a plant breeding strategy to increase the micronutrient content of staple food crops to reduce the burden of micronutrient deficiencies in low- and middle-income countries. In 2003, the HarvestPlus program, based in the centers comprising the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, was initiated to implement the biofortification strategy. This article discusses what has been achieved, what has been learned, and the key challenges to embed biofortification in food systems and to expand its impact. Cost-effectiveness is key to the biofortification strategy. Biofortification piggybacks on the agronomically superior varieties being developed at agricultural research centers. Central plant breeding research discoveries can be spread globally. Farmers have every motivation to adopt the latest high-yielding, high profit crops. High productivity leads to lower food prices. As a consequence, consumers can increase their mineral and vitamin intakes at no additional cost by substituting biofortified staple foods 1-for-1 for nonbiofortified staple foods. After 20 years of investment, biofortified staple food crops are being produced by farmers in over 40 countries and are eaten by hundreds of millions of people. Published nutrition trials have shown nutrient-rich crops to be efficacious. The biofortification strategy is now recognized by the international nutrition community as one effective approach among several interventions needed to reduce micronutrient deficiencies. This is a promising beginning. However, biofortification is still a newly emerging technology. A limitation of biofortification as implemented to date is that densities of single nutrients have been increased in given staple food crops. To reach a higher trajectory, the impacts of biofortification can be multiplied several-fold using genetic engineering and other advanced crop development techniques to combine multiple-nutrient densities with climate-smart traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.