Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669088›Full record

ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2024

Liver venous deprivation (LVD) before extended hepatectomy: a French multicentric retrospective cohort.

Mehdi Boubaddi, Arthur Marichez, Florian Pecquenard, Charlotte Maulat, Emmanuel Buc, Laurent Sulpice, Ahmet Ayav, Stéphanie Truant, Fabrice Muscari, Laurence Chiche and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mehdi BoubaddiHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-6369
Arthur MarichezHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2562-4456
Florian PecquenardHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Lilles, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0844-2340
Charlotte MaulatHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-6592
Emmanuel BucHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-166X
Laurent SulpiceHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-1685
Ahmet AyavHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-5664
Stéphanie TruantHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Lilles, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2828-4864
Fabrice MuscariHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-1686
Laurence ChicheHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9081-4750
Christophe LaurentHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-6349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is the first cause of death after major hepatectomy, and future liver remnant (FLR) volume is the main factor predicting PHLF. Liver venous deprivation (LVD) via portal and hepatic vein embolization has been suggested to induce a better hypertrophy of the FLR than portal vein embolization. The aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to assess safety, feasibility and efficacity of LVD in a French national multicentric register. Methods: Between 2016 and 2023, LVD was performed in 7 expert centers, for patients with liver malignancies requiring major hepatectomy with an FLR percentage of total liver volume (FLR%) ≤25% for a healthy liver or <30% for a diseased liver. FLR volumetry was assessed before and 4 weeks after the procedure. Results: One hundred and ninety-two patients were included in the study. The technical success rate was 100% and severe complication rate post-LVD was 2.6% (5/192). The FLR% increased by 61.7% over an average of 27±9.7 days. Major hepatectomy was performed 40 days after LVD on 161 (83.8%) patients. Hepatectomy was not performed on 31 (16.2%) patients, mostly because of oncological progression. Severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIA) occurred in 21.1% (34/161) of patients. Postoperative mortality rate was 4.3% (7/161). Conclusions: This study is the largest to confirm that LVD is a safe, reproducible, efficient technique that induces rapid major FLR growth. However, this new technique needs to be standardized and harmonized between centers to ensure uniform results.

Indexed as

hepatectomyliver hypertrophyLiver venous deprivation (LVD)post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF)

Identifiers

PMID39669088
PMCPMC11634414

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.