Evidence mapPaperPMID 39669185Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Paediatric: Challenges for the Future.

Ahmed M Salih, Gloria Menegaz, Thillagavathie Pillay, Elaine M Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed M SalihDepartment of Population Health Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0871-8282
Gloria MenegazDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine University of Verona Verona Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-3461
Thillagavathie PillayResearch Institute for Health Related Sciences, University of Wolverhampton Wolverhampton UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4159-3282
Elaine M BoyleDepartment of Population Health Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5038-3148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) emerged to improve the transparency of machine learning models and increase understanding of how models make actions and decisions. It helps to present complex models in a more digestible form from a human perspective. However, XAI is still in the development stage and must be used carefully in sensitive domains including paediatrics, where misuse might have adverse consequences. Objective: This commentary paper discusses concerns and challenges related to implementation and interpretation of XAI methods, with the aim of rising awareness of the main concerns regarding their adoption in paediatrics. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to explore the challenges of adopting XAI in paediatrics. Results: Although XAI has several favorable outcomes, its implementation in paediatrics is prone to challenges including generalizability, trustworthiness, causality and intervention, and XAI evaluation. Conclusion: Paediatrics is a very sensitive domain where consequences of misinterpreting AI outcomes might be very significant. XAI should be adopted carefully with focus on evaluating the outcomes primarily by including paediatricians in the loop, enriching the pipeline by injecting domain knowledge promoting a cross-fertilization perspective aiming at filling the gaps still preventing its adoption.

Indexed as

challengesexplainable artificial intelligenceinterpretationpaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39669185
PMCPMC11635175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.