ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Survival of a patient following initial left ventricular assist device implantation and two successive left ventricular assist device exchanges: case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Initially conceptualized as a bridge to heart transplantation, the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has become an important option for improving survival in patients with severe heart failure and poor prognosis. Case summary: We report the case of a patient suffering from severe chronic heart failure, complicated by ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to left main coronary artery stenosis (NYHA IV, INTERMACS profile 1). Despite support with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, inotropes, and catecholamine therapy, the patient's cardiac function did not recover sufficiently. Consequently, the decision was made to proceed with LVAD implantation as destination therapy. The initial LVAD implantation was uneventful, and the patient received anticoagulant therapy according to standard operating procedure. However, pump thrombosis occurred on the first post-operative day, necessitating an LVAD exchange. Following an extended stay in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit, the patient was eventually discharged. Approximately 15 months later, the patient developed a driveline infection, involving most of the intrapericardial components of the LVAD. A second LVAD exchange was required, and the patient received a third LVAD. To mitigate the risk of recurrent infection, suppressive antibiotic therapy with ampicillin/sulbactam was initiated. Discussion: This is the first reported case of a patient surviving three LVAD implantations and highlights an instance of off-label use of lifelong antibiotic therapy following a driveline infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.