ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Predicting patients with septic shock and sepsis through analyzing whole-blood expression of NK cell-related hub genes using an advanced machine learning framework.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Anion gap trajectory patterns and prognosis in sepsis patients: A multicenter retrospective study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Care Pathway and Outcomes in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review from Emergency Department Recognition to PICU Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A synergistic multi-omics approach: causal sepsis drivers identified in activated CD4Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Outcomes of septic shock from urinary and non-urinary sources in nonagenarians and centenarians admitted to intensive care units.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- T cell-related diagnostic model and the underlying mechanism related to PRF1-mediated glycolysis in sepsis: evidences from single-cell, bulk transcriptomics, and experiment validation.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- IDO1 induced macrophage M1 polarization via ER stress-associated GRP78-XBP1 pathway to promote ulcerative colitis progression.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted phenotyping of sepsis: Research progress, clinical challenges, and translational prospects.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that causes millions of deaths globally each year. The need for biomarkers to predict the progression of sepsis to septic shock remains critical, with rapid, reliable methods still lacking. Transcriptomics data has recently emerged as a valuable resource for disease phenotyping and endotyping, making it a promising tool for predicting disease stages. Therefore, we aimed to establish an advanced machine learning framework to predict sepsis and septic shock using transcriptomics datasets with rapid turnaround methods. Methods: We retrieved four NCBI GEO transcriptomics datasets previously generated from peripheral blood samples of healthy individuals and patients with sepsis and septic shock. The datasets were processed for bioinformatic analysis and supplemented with a series of bench experiments, leading to the identification of a hub gene panel relevant to sepsis and septic shock. The hub gene panel was used to establish a novel prediction model to distinguish sepsis from septic shock through a multistage machine learning pipeline, incorporating linear discriminant analysis, risk score analysis, and ensemble method combined with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator analysis. Finally, we validated the prediction model with the hub gene dataset generated by RT-qPCR using peripheral blood samples from newly recruited patients. Results: Our analysis led to identify six hub genes ( Conclusions: Our bioinformatic approach led to the discovery of the 6-HubGss biomarker panel and the development of the SepxFindeR machine learning model, enabling accurate prediction of septic shock and distinction from sepsis with rapid processing capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.