ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
Automated fingerprint analysis as a diagnostic tool for the genetic disorder Kabuki syndrome.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Emerging therapeutic strategies for Kabuki syndrome (KS) make early diagnosis critical. Fingerprint analysis as a diagnostic aid for KS diagnosis could facilitate early diagnosis and expand the current patient base for clinical trials and natural history studies. Method: Fingerprints of 74 individuals with KS, 1 individual with a KS-like phenotype, and 108 controls were collected through a mobile app. KS fingerprint patterns were studied using logistic regression and a convolutional neural network to differentiate KS individuals from controls. Results: Our analysis identified 2 novel KS metrics (folding finger ridge count and simple pattern), which significantly differentiated KS fingerprints from controls, producing an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.82 [0.75; 0.89] and a likelihood ratio of 9.0. This metric showed a sensitivity of 35.6% [23.73%; 47.46%] and a specificity of 96.04% [92.08%; 99.01%]. An independent artificial intelligence convolutional neural network classification-based method validated this finding and yielded comparable results, with a likelihood ratio of 8.7, sensitivity of 76.6%, and specificity of 91.2%. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that automatic fingerprint analysis can have diagnostic use for KS and possible future utility for diagnosing other genetic disorders, enabling greater access to genetic diagnosis in areas with limited availability of genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.