ReviewJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
Pathophysiology of oral lesions subsequent to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amidst worldwide reports of adverse oral lesions subsequent to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, the current systematic review planned to determine the prevalence of adverse oral events in adult individuals (≥18 years) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, emphasizing upon the type and dose of vaccine, time of onset, and underlying pathophysiology. The registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42023421307), conforming with PRISMA guidelines, included an all-inclusive literature search through online databases, consisting of Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Lilacs, Livivo, and PROSPERO, completed on 2 May 2023, followed by assessment of risk of bias by Joana Briggs Institute Evaluation Checklist. Due to the paucity of literature, case reports and case series were included. Self-reported lesions were excluded. Qualitative synthesis employing Microsoft Excel software 2019 revealed low prevalence (43 subjects) from 26 case reports and two case series. There were multiple erosive oral ulcers on gingiva, palate, burning pain in the mouth, xerostomia, tongue fissuring and glossitis, palatal petechiae, diffuse erythematous lesions and loss of smell (16.2%), primary herpetic gingivostomatitis (21%), oral lichen planus (16.2%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (6.9%), Bell's palsy in four cases where two cases were Guillain-Barré syndrome (9.3%), erythema multiforme (11.6%), pemphigus (4.6%), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (6.9%), unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy (4.6%), and trigeminal neuralgia (2.3%). Maximum cases (22 subjects) presented oral lesions after Pfizer (BNT162b2) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. No association was found between the vaccine type and dose with oral side effects. Dentists must be aware of the oral adverse effects after coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination to better understand the pathogenesis and the risk factors associated with such reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.