ReviewJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025
Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients: Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.
Review in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Histological efficacy of high-dose intravenous vitamin C infusion in severely burned patients.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe burn injury poses significant clinical challenges, often necessitating the use of vasoactive agents to maintain perfusion. This narrative review explores the current landscape of vasoactive agents in acute burn shock resuscitation and in severe burn-injured patients who develop septic shock, with a particular focus on the potential role of the novel vasoactive agent, synthetic angiotensin-II (AT-II), in these settings. While catecholamines and vasopressin remain cornerstone therapies, adverse effects, variable patient responses, and a new understanding of burn injury pathophysiology highlight the potentially evolving role of vasoactive agents in these clinical scenarios. A key system involved in blood pressure regulation, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, is often dysregulated in acute burn and septic shock. Contributory mechanisms and potential benefits of synthetic AT-II are discussed here and form the physiologic rationale behind the exogenous administration of synthetic AT-II in the context of available safety and efficacy data. To date, administration of synthetic AT-II has shown promise in improving hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in distributive shock populations; however, data in acute burn shock and in burn patients who develop septic shock are lacking. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the potential and future areas of research in burn shock and severe burn-injured patients is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.