Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39672010›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025

Super-resolution left ventricular flow and pressure mapping by Navier-Stokes-informed neural networks.

Bahetihazi Maidu, Pablo Martinez-Legazpi, Manuel Guerrero-Hurtado, Cathleen M Nguyen, Alejandro Gonzalo, Andrew M Kahn, Javier Bermejo, Oscar Flores, Juan C Del Alamo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bahetihazi MaiduDept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pablo Martinez-LegazpiDept. of Mathematical Physics and Fluids. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia & CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Guerrero-HurtadoDept. of Aerospace Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.
Cathleen M NguyenDept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alejandro GonzaloDept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew M KahnDept. of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon & CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.
Javier BermejoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine., University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Oscar FloresDept. of Aerospace Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.
Juan C Del AlamoDept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: juancar@uw.edu.

Funding

Mechanistic Relationships Between Fibrosis, Fibrillation, and Stroke: Multi-Scale, Multi-Physics SimulationsR01HL158667 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Patrick M Boyle · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Patient-specific thrombosis risk in atrial fibrillation by 4D CT imaging of atrial kinetics combined with computational fluid dynamicsR01HL160024 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEL ALAMO, JUAN CARLOS, KAHN, ANDREW · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158667NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL160024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraventricular vector flow mapping (VFM) is an increasingly adopted echocardiographic technique that derives time-resolved two-dimensional flow maps in the left ventricle (LV) from color-Doppler sequences. Current VFM models rely on kinematic constraints arising from planar flow incompressibility. However, these models are not informed by crucial information about flow physics; most notably the forces within the fluid and the resulting accelerations. This limitation has rendered VFM unable to combine information from different time frames in an acquisition sequence or derive fluctuating pressure maps. In this study, we leveraged recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) to develop AI-VFM, a vector flow mapping modality that uses physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) encoding mass conservation and momentum balance inside the LV, and no-slip boundary conditions at the LV endocardium. AI-VFM recovers the flow and pressure fields in the LV from standard echocardiographic scans. It performs phase unwrapping and recovers flow data in areas without input color-Doppler data. AI-VFM also recovers complete flow maps at time points without color-Doppler input data, producing super-resolution flow maps. We validate AI-VFM using physiological simulated LV data and show that informing the PINNs with momentum balance is essential for achieving temporal super-resolution and significantly increases the accuracy of AI-VFM compared to informing the PINNs only with mass conservation. AI-VFM is solely informed by each patient's flow physics; it does not utilize explicit smoothness constraints or incorporate data from other patients or flow models. AI-VFM takes 15 min to run in off-the-shelf graphics processing units and its underlying PINN framework could be extended to map other flow-associated metrics such as blood residence time or the concentration of coagulation species.

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesModels, CardiovascularNeural Networks, ComputerVentricular Function, LeftHumansCardiovascular flowDeep learningEchocardiographyPhysics-informed neural networksSuper-resolution flow imagingVector flow imaging

Identifiers

PMID39672010
PMCPMC11798758

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.