ArticlePediatric research2025
Circadian clock activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells of preterm and term neonates.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring mammalian gestation, fetal circadian rhythms are thought to be mainly controlled by maternal signals. In humans, the initiation and activity of central and peripheral circadian clocks is largely unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the developmental clock properties in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).
methodsHUVECs were obtained from (a) preterm infants, subgrouped according to birth weight or gestational age classification, and (b) term infants (in total: n = 60). In vitro clock activity was determined by using live bioluminescence recording of a luciferase reporter gene under circadian control over 120 h. In addition, core clock and clock-associated gene expression were quantified using NanoString technology.
resultsPeripheral clock activity was detected, regardless of prematurity and birth weight classification. The mean period, amplitude, and phase of circadian oscillations were not significantly associated with gestational age or birth weight classification.
conclusionsPeripheral clock activity can be demonstrated in HUVECs from both preterm and term infants without significant developmental differences in the period, amplitude, and phase of oscillations. This model may be useful to identify perturbation factors of proper development and entrainment of neonatal circadian clock activity. IMPACT: We established a model system for analyzing the peripheral clock in preterm and term HUVECs. In HUVECs, the peripheral clock exhibits functional in vitro activity independent of gestational age or birth weight categories. In this model system, neither significant developmental differences exist in the period, amplitude, and phase, nor in the expression of circadian core clock and clock-associated genes. Entrainment and proper function of the circadian clock deserve attention in neonatal intensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.