Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39672825›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Home phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: current practices and attitudes.

Maryse C Cnossen, Jessie Spaan, Maria S Fleischmann, Berthe A M van der Geest, Erwin Ista, Christian V Hulzebos, Jasper V Been, Hanneke W Harmsen van der Vliet-Torij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maryse C CnossenResearch Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.c.cnossen@hr.nl.
Jessie SpaanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria S FleischmannResearch Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Berthe A M van der GeestDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin IstaDivision of Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian V HulzebosDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jasper V BeenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W Harmsen van der Vliet-TorijResearch Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal hyperbilirubinemia is a leading cause of hospitalization during the first week of life. Recent research suggest that phototherapy, the standard treatment, can be safely and effectively administered at home. Some Dutch hospitals have already adopted home-based phototherapy. The TREAT Jaundice@home study aims to contribute to its broader implementation across the Netherlands. Understanding the perspectives, perceptions, and needs of healthcare professionals is essential for facilitating this implementation.

methodsThis cross-sectional survey targeted pediatricians, midwives, and maternity care assistants with and without prior experience with phototherapy at home. The 82-item questionnaire covered respondent background, experience, interests, motivation, responsibilities, logistics, collaboration, knowledge, indications and contraindications, financial aspects, and implementation readiness.

resultsThe study included responses from 16 pediatricians, 90 community midwives, and 514 maternity care assistants. Findings indicate a positive reception of phototherapy at home, regardless of prior experience. The majority expressed satisfaction, recognized potential benefits, and/or demonstrated a willingness to adopt this innovation. Key challenges identified include the need for information, the lack of guidelines, coordination and collaboration issues, and concerns about financial compensation. DISCUSSION: Phototherapy at home is well-received by healthcare professionals. Addressing the identified challenges is imperative for successful implementation, ultimately benefiting neonates, their families, and healthcare systems. IMPACT: Phototherapy at home is well-received and perceived as beneficial by healthcare professionals with and without prior experience Key challenges include the need for better knowledge and guidelines, coordination and collaboration issues among healthcare professionals, and concerns about financial compensation Addressing these challenges through comprehensive information, standardized protocols, improved collaboration, and adequate financial compensation is essential to successfully implement phototherapy at home on a larger scale.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHome Care ServicesHyperbilirubinemia, NeonatalPhototherapyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMidwiferyNetherlandsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39672825
PMCPMC12454146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.