ArticleSleep2025
Pupillometric and perceptual approaches provide independent estimates of melanopsin activity in humans.
Article in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationships between light exposure and aspects of cognitive function in everyday life.Communications psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesMelanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells, which provide light information to time sleep and entrain circadian clocks, also influence perceived brightness raising the possibility that psychophysical paradigms could be used to explore the origins and implications of variability in melanopic sensitivity. We aimed to develop accessible psychophysical tests of melanopic vision and relate outcomes with a pupillometric measure of melanopsin function (post-illumination pupil response) and prior light exposure.
methodsIndividually calibrated pairs of isoluminant stimuli differing in melanopic radiance from a four primary source were presented sequentially with superimposed random color offsets in a two alternative forced choice brightness preference paradigm to 41 naïve adult participants with personal light exposure data for the prior 7 days and post-illumination pupil response measures defined by comparing maintained pupil constriction for luminance matched "red" vs "blue" pulses.
resultsAcross participants we observed the expected tendency to report positive melanopsin contrast stimuli as "brighter" (one-tailed t-test p < 0.001), but with substantial inter-individual variability in both sensitivity (melanopsin contrast at criterion preference p = 0.75) and amplitude (preference at maximum melanopic contrast). There was little correlation between these psychophysical outcomes and post-illumination pupil response magnitude, or between either psychophysical or post-illumination pupil response measures and light history metrics (pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients -0.5> < 0.5). Random forest machine learning failed to satisfactorily predict outcome for either psychophysical or post-illumination pupil response measures based upon these inputs.
conclusionsOur findings reveal that estimates of melanopic function provided by perceptual and pupillometric paradigms can be largely independent of one another and of recent history of light exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.