ArticleAMB Express2024
Bioconversion efficiency and chemical composition of Hermetia illucens larvae fed spent mushroom substrates.
Article in AMB Express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upcycling Agri-Food Side-Streams viaFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The hidden drivers: Unraveling the impact of density, moisture, and scale on Hermetia illucens rearing.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spent mushroom substrate (SMS) is a by-product remaining after harvesting mushrooms. We evaluated the effect of substituting chicken feed with 0-100% of Pleurotus eryngii and Lentinula edodes SMS at different stocking densities (200-1000 larvae/box) on development, composition, and substrate reduction of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae. Although the survival rate was not significantly different, feeding pure SMS led to a low growth rate. The substitution level of SMS negatively correlated with individual larval weight, total harvested biomass, larval growth rate (LGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), substrate reduction, and waste reduction index (WRI) except for the 20% substitution. Feeding 40% SMS resulted in the highest number of prepupae. In the density experiment, the heaviest larvae (220-239 mg fresh weight) were obtained at 200 larvae/box in the 0% SMS group. The frass residue and FCR decreased with increased density. Remarkably, when feeding 20% SMS at 250 larvae/box, the harvested biomass, LGR, and FCR did not differ significantly from the 0% SMS control, whereas some of the higher densities led to a deterioration. In fact, the frass residue, substrate reduction, and WRI were even improved at 250 larvae/box in the 20% SMS group. The chemical analyses of larvae reared on 20% SMS at 250 larvae/box showed comparable ash and fat contents and a higher protein content compared to the 0% SMS group. Accordingly, up to 20% of a standard diet such as chicken feed can be replaced by low-cost SMS without disadvantages for breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.