ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Comparison between female kidney donors with prediabetes and without diabetes in blood pressure measurements, kidney and diabetes biomarkers: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, Fertility Restoration, and Reproductive Safety in Women of Reproductive Age: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association of the Triglyceride-Glucose Index with Body Composition and Laboratory Parameters in Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3-5.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Metabolic Syndrome Is Associated with the Prognosis in Elderly Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
- Sex-Specific Associations Between Metabolic Patterns and Renal Function Decline: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Southeastern China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA comprehensive evaluation of potential living kidney donors is crucial to ensure their short and long-term safety. We explored differences in kidney biochemical indicators, blood pressure measurements, and glucose control pre- and post-kidney donation between women with pre-diabetes and those with normal glucose levels.
methodsWe performed a prospective cohort study at West Bank and Gaza University hospitals between 2016 and 2022. Differences in sociodemographic and clinical factors that were collected from the participants' medical records between women with pre-diabetes and without diabetes, pre- and post-donation, were assessed using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for variables with skewed distribution. Trained nurses performed anthropometric measurements and drew fasting blood samples at various time points from one year before donation to five years after donation.
resultsAltogether, 114 female kidney donors (57 with pre-diabetes) aged 27-45 years (median = 35.7, IQR = 5.6) were included in the study. The post-donation median Body Mass Index (BMI) remained higher in women with pre-diabetes (35.02) than in those without diabetes (29.34) five years after donation, (P < 0.001). The 24 h protein, diastolic, and systolic blood pressure levels were significantly higher among women with pre-diabetes than among those without diabetes five years after donation, (P < 0.001). The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower in pre-diabetic women (78.2 ml/min/1.73 m
conclusionsPre-diabetic donors showed an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including hypertension, impaired oral glucose tolerance test, worsening kidney function, and proteinuria. Our findings underscore the importance of maintaining regular check-ups and follow-ups in particular in pre-diabetic kidney donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39674978What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.