Evidence mapPaperPMID 39675825Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Advancement in predictive biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis and related outcomes: a scoping review.

Hasini Rathnayake, Luhao Han, Fabrício da Silva Costa, Cristiane Paganoti, Brett Dyer, Avinash Kundur, Indu Singh, Olivia J Holland

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hasini RathnayakeGriffith University School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-6692
Luhao HanGriffith University School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Fabrício da Silva CostaMaternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Cristiane PaganotiMaternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Brett DyerGriffith Biostatistics Unit, Griffith University - Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Avinash KundurGriffith University School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Indu SinghGriffith University School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Olivia J HollandGriffith University School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia o.holland@griffith.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a metabolic disorder associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. While GDM is diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance testing between 24-28 weeks, earlier prediction of risk of developing GDM via circulating biomarkers has the potential to risk-stratify women and implement targeted risk reduction before adverse obstetric outcomes. This scoping review aims to collate biomarkers associated with GDM development, associated perinatal outcome and medication requirement in GDM.

designThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews was used to guide the study. DATA SOURCES: This review searched for articles on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Web of Science from January 2013 to February 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The eligibility criteria included analytical observational studies published in English, focusing on pregnant women with maternal plasma or serum biomarkers collected between 6 and 24 weeks of gestation. Studies were excluded if they evaluated drug effects, non-GDM diabetes types or involved twin pregnancies, microbiota, genetic analyses or non-English publications. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data. One reviewer extracted data from papers included in the scoping review using Covidence. From the 8837 retrieved records, 137 studies were included.

resultsA total of 278 biomarkers with significant changes in individuals with GDM compared with controls were identified. The univariate predictive biomarkers exhibited insufficient clinical sensitivity and specificity for predicting GDM, perinatal outcomes, and the necessity of medication. Multivariable models combining maternal risk factors with biomarkers provided more accurate detection but required validation for use in clinical settings.

conclusionThis review recommends further research integrating novel omics technology for building accurate models for predicting GDM, perinatal outcome, and the necessity of medication while considering the optimal testing time.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeBiomarkersDiabetes in pregnancyOBSTETRICSPregnancyPregnant WomenPrenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39675825
PMCPMC11647389

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.