ArticleBMJ open2024
Advancement in predictive biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis and related outcomes: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-metabolite microbiota-associated signature for early risk stratification of gestational diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Redox Imbalance in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanistic Insights, Emerging Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Small Extracellular Vesicles in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Current Landscape and Emerging Diagnostic Horizons.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Review
- The influence of fetal sex on preterm birth risk in gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus and related pediatric outcomes.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Review
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the timing of diagnosis of gestational diabetes: A critical appraisal.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- From Molecular Insights to Clinical Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Insights into the Global and Mexican Context of Placental-Derived Pregnancy Complications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a metabolic disorder associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. While GDM is diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance testing between 24-28 weeks, earlier prediction of risk of developing GDM via circulating biomarkers has the potential to risk-stratify women and implement targeted risk reduction before adverse obstetric outcomes. This scoping review aims to collate biomarkers associated with GDM development, associated perinatal outcome and medication requirement in GDM.
designThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews was used to guide the study. DATA SOURCES: This review searched for articles on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Web of Science from January 2013 to February 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The eligibility criteria included analytical observational studies published in English, focusing on pregnant women with maternal plasma or serum biomarkers collected between 6 and 24 weeks of gestation. Studies were excluded if they evaluated drug effects, non-GDM diabetes types or involved twin pregnancies, microbiota, genetic analyses or non-English publications. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data. One reviewer extracted data from papers included in the scoping review using Covidence. From the 8837 retrieved records, 137 studies were included.
resultsA total of 278 biomarkers with significant changes in individuals with GDM compared with controls were identified. The univariate predictive biomarkers exhibited insufficient clinical sensitivity and specificity for predicting GDM, perinatal outcomes, and the necessity of medication. Multivariable models combining maternal risk factors with biomarkers provided more accurate detection but required validation for use in clinical settings.
conclusionThis review recommends further research integrating novel omics technology for building accurate models for predicting GDM, perinatal outcome, and the necessity of medication while considering the optimal testing time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.