ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
Next-generation sequencing in the molecular classification of endometrial carcinomas: Experience with 270 cases suggesting a potentially more aggressive clinical behavior of multiple classifier endometrial carcinomas.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Profile of Advanced Endometrial Cancer (FIGO III-IV) in a Polish Multicentre Cohort: Clinicopathological Characterisation and Treatment Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Stratification of Multiple-Classifier Endometrial Cancers: Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Article
- Clinical and molecular heterogeneity in advanced-stageFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular classification of endometrial carcinomas (EC) divides these neoplasms into four distinct subgroups based on their molecular background. Given its clinical significance, genetic examination is becoming integral to the diagnostic process. This study aims to share our experience with the molecular classification of EC using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). We included all ECs diagnosed at two institutions from 2020 to the present. All cases were prospectively examined by IHC for MMR proteins and p53, followed by NGS using a customized panel covering 18 genes, based on which ECs were classified into four molecular subgroups: POLE mutated, hypermutated (MMR deficient), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and TP53 mutated. The cohort comprised 270 molecularly classified ECs: 18 (6.6%) POLE mutated, 85 (31.5%) hypermutated, 137 (50.7%) NSMP, and 30 (11.1%) TP53 mutated. Twelve cases (4.4%) were classified as 'multiple classifier' EC. Notably, most of these cases with available follow-up (6/9) behaved aggressively. Within the POLEmut EC group, 3/4 cases had advanced tumors, including one patient who died of the disease. Similarly, in the MMRd/TP53mut group, 3/5 patients with available follow-up had metastatic disease, leading to death of the patient in 1 case. ECs of NSMP showed multiple genetic alterations, with the most common mutations being PTEN (44% within the group of NSMP), followed by PIK3CA (30%), ARID1A (21%), and KRAS (9%). Our findings suggest that combining immunohistochemistry with NGS offers a more reliable classification of ECs, including 'multiple classifier' cases, which, based on our observations, tend to exhibit aggressive behavior. Additionally, our data highlight the complex genetic background of NSMP ECs, which can facilitate further stratification of tumors within this group and potentially help select patients for dedicated clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39676078What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.