Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2024
Success rate of acceleromyographic neuromuscular monitoring based on the depth of anesthesia at the time of sugammadex antagonism: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to compare the success of non-normalized acceleromyographic neuromuscular monitoring and recovery profiles based on the depth of anesthesia at the time of sugammadex administration.
methodsPatients undergoing general anesthesia were prospectively and randomly allocated to two groups. In the BIS60 group, sugammadex was administered when there was a bispectral index (BIS) <60 and anesthesia was maintained until a train-of-four ratio ≥1.0 was obtained, whereas in the BIS70 group, anesthesia was stopped at the completion of surgery, sugammadex was administered when the BIS was >70, and the recovery of neuromuscular function was monitored. The recovery profile and the incidence of emergence agitation of the two groups were compared.
resultsThe success rate of neuromuscular monitoring was significantly higher for the BIS60 group than for the BIS70 group (100%
conclusionAfter the administration of sugammadex, the maintenance of anesthesia until the full recovery of neuromuscular function increases the success rate of neuromuscular monitoring without delaying recovery and reduces the risk of emergence agitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.