ReviewKorean journal of anesthesiology2025
A comprehensive analysis of propofol abuse, addiction and neuropharmacological aspects: an updated review.
Review in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Repetitive intentional foreign body ingestion: Risk of abuse of propofol in endoscopic procedures].Der Nervenarzt · 2026Review
- Integration of epidemiological surveys, network pharmacology, and molecular docking simulation to explore the potential key targets of propofol-induced euphoria.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Propofol for depression: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Anesthesiology for Sleep Disorders in the Perioperative Period.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
- AMPA Receptor Within the Prelimbic Cortex Regulates Propofol-Induced Locomotor Sensitization.Addiction biology · 2025Article
- [Cannabidiol regulates circadian rhythm to improve sleep disorders following general anesthesia in rats].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Determination of the Long-Term Stability of Propofol in Human Plasma Frozen for Eight Years and Quantified by UHPLC-MS/MS.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Effects of intravenous propofol combined with opioids on euphoria in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to assess the existing studies on propofol, a relatively new intravenous anesthetic, related to its abuse and addictive potential and to explain the neurobiological and neuropharmacological aspects of propofol addiction. Several neurobiological factors related to complex processes in the brain influence propofol abuse and addiction. In this review, we assessed the literature regarding propofol abuse and addiction, including both experimental and clinical studies. We selected articles from animal studies, case reports, clinical trials, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews to extract all relevant crucial quantitative data with a measure of neurobiological and neuropharmacological aspects. Thus, the main goal of this study was to investigate the current literature and discuss the association between the central nervous system and propofol abuse and addiction in the context of addictive behavior. Current data suggest that propofol has a strong addictive potential and produces prominent addiction in both animals and humans. Thus, medical practitioners should exercise caution with propofol use, and we argue that this drug should be added to the list of controlled substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.