ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Distinguishing Characteristics of Benign Versus Malignant Intraosseous Schwannomas: A Comparative Study.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBenign and malignant intraosseous schwannomas are rare, and primarily documented in case reports. This study aims to elucidate the differences in clinical features and imaging manifestations between these tumors. This will help clinicians identify malignant lesions at an early stage, reliable guide treatment decisions, and accurately predict outcomes.
methodsEighteen patients who underwent surgery and got pathological examinations in our hospital from 2012 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 14 cases were found benign with 4 malignant. In the benign group, patients underwent curettage followed by bone grafting, whereas the malignant group was treated with extensive resection or amputation. Patients' demographics and radiographic features, including gender, age at diagnosis, symptom duration, tumor location, tumor margin, and the ratio of sclerotic margins were documented and compared between these tumors. All imaging was reviewed by two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists, who also quantified the sclerotic margin ratio. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine inter-observer agreement. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for continuous clinical variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.
resultsIn our series, the mean age of these patients was 43.1 ± 14.0 years, six patients were male and 12 were female. Pain was the predominant preoperative symptom. The average duration from symptom onset to initial physician visit was 28.5 ± 25.3 months for benign schwannomas and 8.3 ± 4.3 months for malignant schwannomas (p = 0.012). On plain radiographs, 13 (13/14) of benign schwannomas exhibited well-defined margins of bone destruction, compared to 1 (1/4) of malignant schwannomas (p = 0.019). Furthermore, benign schwannomas had a significantly higher sclerotic margin ratio (75.5%) than malignant ones (16.7%) (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of cortical bone destruction (p = 1.0). On MRI, both tumors demonstrated intermediate to slightly hypointense signal intensity on T1-weighted images and heterogeneous high signal intensities on T2-weighted images.
conclusionsDespite their rarity, benign and malignant intraosseous schwannomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with painful and radiographically lytic bone lesions, especially in the mandible, sacrum, and vertebrae. The ratio of sclerotic margins, which we proposed for the first time, in combination with symptom duration and the clarity of tumor margins, provide valuable diagnostic clues for distinguishing the malignancy of the tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.