Evidence mapPaperPMID 39676749Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025

Metformin and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with gestational diabetes in the United Kingdom: A population-based cohort study.

Ya-Hui Yu, Robert W Platt, Pauline Reynier, Oriana H Y Yu, Kristian B Filion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ya-Hui YuDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Robert W PlattCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pauline ReynierCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Oriana H Y YuCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kristian B FilionCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6055-0088

Funding

Albert Boehringer I Chair in PharmacoepidemiologyCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) PJT-173271Ferring Fellowship in Health from McGill UniversityFRQS; Quebec Foundation for Health ResearchWilliam Dawson Scholar award from McGill University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMetformin is increasingly used off-label as the treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM). Our objective was to determine if metformin versus insulin initiation is associated with the adverse pregnancy outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, its pregnancy register, and Hospital Episode Statistics from 1998 to 2018. We included pregnancies of women who initiated metformin or insulin between 20 weeks gestation and pregnancy end. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia. The secondary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth, caesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP). Inverse probability weighted-Cox proportional hazards models were to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), comparing those who initiated metformin versus insulin at cohort entry, accounting for baseline covariates.

resultsOur cohort included pregnancies of 1297 women initiating metformin and of 895 women initiating insulin. Compared to insulin initiation, metformin initiation was associated with a decreased risk of LGA or macrosomia (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.78), Caesarean delivery (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69, 0.98), and preterm birth (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58, 1.08). The HRs for HDP and SGA were 0.92 (95% CI 0.57, 1.27) and 1.33 (95% CI 0.67, 2.00), respectively.

conclusionsOur study suggests that, compared to initiating insulin, initiating metformin is associated with decreased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with GDM. These findings provide important real-world evidence regarding the use of metformin for GDM.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFetal MacrosomiaHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPregnancy OutcomeAdultCesarean SectionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeInsulinPregnancyPremature BirthRetrospective StudiesHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminadverse pregnancy outcomesgestational diabetesinsulinmetforminpopulation‐base cohort

Identifiers

PMID39676749
PMCPMC11701188

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.