ReviewCureus2024
Implications of the Gut Microbiome in Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distant Origins of Local Pathologies: Rethinking the Systemic Roots of Alzheimer's Disease and Beyond.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Role of Antioxidants in Modulating the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis and Their Impact on Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Integrating genetic and immune profiles for personalized immunotherapy in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, with its prevalence doubling approximately every decade. It is a significant contributor to disability-adjusted life-years in individuals aged 50 and older, impacting a substantial portion of this population globally. The pathophysiology of AD is primarily explained by two hypotheses: the amyloid cascade hypothesis and the tau hypothesis. While the amyloid cascade hypothesis is widely accepted as the main contributor to AD, both mechanisms promote neuroinflammation by driving the formation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles, which are key features of the neurodegenerative process. Recent studies highlight the critical role of the gut microbiome (GMB) in the progression of AD. Gut dysbiosis has been linked to neuroinflammation, altered Aβ metabolism, blood-brain barrier disruption, and changes in neuroactive metabolites. Targeting the GMB offers potential therapeutic avenues aimed at restoring microbial balance and mitigating the effects of dysbiosis. The gut-brain axis, crucial for neurological health, remains underexplored in AD, especially since current research is limited to animal models and small human studies, leaving uncertainty about specific gut bacteria's roles in AD. Currently, pharmacological treatments for AD include cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. This review discusses newer and emerging treatments targeting Aβ and tau pathology, alongside microbiome-based interventions. Larger, human-based studies with diverse populations are essential to establish the therapeutic efficacy of these microbiome-targeted treatments and their long-term impact on AD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.