Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677367›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Artificial intelligence in food and nutrition evidence: The challenges and opportunities.

Regan L Bailey, Amanda J MacFarlane, Martha S Field, Ilias Tagkopoulos, Sergio E Baranzini, Kristen M Edwards, Christopher J Rose, Nicholas J Schork, Akshat Singhal, Byron C Wallace and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Regan L BaileyDepartment of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, Cater-Mattil Hall, 373 Olsen Blvd Room 130, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Amanda J MacFarlaneDepartment of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, Cater-Mattil Hall, 373 Olsen Blvd Room 130, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Martha S FieldDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Savage Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-5180
Ilias TagkopoulosDepartment of Computer Science and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Sergio E BaranziniDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1651 4th St, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0067-194X
Kristen M EdwardsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4316-8119
Christopher J RoseCluster for Reviews and Health Technology Assessments, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 222 Skøyen, 0213 Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6457-8168
Nicholas J SchorkTranslational Genomics Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Akshat SinghalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5371-526X
Byron C WallaceKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, #202, West Village Residence Complex H, 440 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Kelly P FisherInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Texas A&M University, Borlaug Building, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1557-9556
Konstantinos MarkakisDepartment of Computer Science and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0018-5466
Patrick J StoverDepartment of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, Cater-Mattil Hall, 373 Olsen Blvd Room 130, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7546-3814

Funding

Development of a Total Nutrient IndexU01CA215834 · NCI · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI REGAN BAILEY, JANET A. TOOZE · 2017 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA215834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Science-informed decisions are best guided by the objective synthesis of the totality of evidence around a particular question and assessing its trustworthiness through systematic processes. However, there are major barriers and challenges that limit science-informed food and nutrition policy, practice, and guidance. First, insufficient evidence, primarily due to acquisition cost of generating high-quality data, and the complexity of the diet-disease relationship. Furthermore, the sheer number of systematic reviews needed across the entire agriculture and food value chain, and the cost and time required to conduct them, can delay the translation of science to policy. Artificial intelligence offers the opportunity to (i) better understand the complex etiology of diet-related chronic diseases, (ii) bring more precision to our understanding of the variation among individuals in the diet-chronic disease relationship, (iii) provide new types of computed data related to the efficacy and effectiveness of nutrition/food interventions in health promotion, and (iv) automate the generation of systematic reviews that support timely decisions. These advances include the acquisition and synthesis of heterogeneous and multimodal datasets. This perspective summarizes a meeting convened at the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The purpose of the meeting was to examine the current state and future potential of artificial intelligence in generating new types of computed data as well as automating the generation of systematic reviews to support evidence-based food and nutrition policy, practice, and guidance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputed evidenceevidence synthesisnutritionsystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID39677367
PMCPMC11638775

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.