Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677571›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2024

Mating systems and recombination landscape strongly shape genetic diversity and selection in wheat relatives.

Concetta Burgarella, Marie-Fleur Brémaud, Gesa Von Hirschheydt, Veronique Viader, Morgane Ardisson, Sylvain Santoni, Vincent Ranwez, Miguel de Navascués, Jacques David, Sylvain Glémin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Concetta BurgarellaCNRS, Univ. Montpellier, ISEM - UMR 5554, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4522-4297
Marie-Fleur BrémaudAGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Gesa Von HirschheydtSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Veronique ViaderAGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Morgane ArdissonAGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Sylvain SantoniAGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Vincent RanwezAGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Miguel de NavascuésUMR CBGP, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Jacques DavidAGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Sylvain GléminCNRS, Univ. Rennes, ECOBIO - UMR 6553, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How and why genetic diversity varies among species is a long-standing question in evolutionary biology. Life history traits have been shown to explain a large part of observed diversity. Among them, mating systems have one of the strongest impacts on genetic diversity, with selfing species usually exhibiting much lower diversity than outcrossing relatives. Theory predicts that a high rate of selfing amplifies selection at linked sites, reducing genetic diversity genome-wide, but frequent bottlenecks and rapid population turn-over could also explain low genetic diversity in selfers. However, how linked selection varies with mating systems and whether it is sufficient to explain the observed difference between selfers and outcrossers has never been tested. Here, we used the

Indexed as

fitness effect of mutationslinked selectionpolymorphismself-fertilizationselfing syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39677571
PMCPMC11637685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.