ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Cell Type Differentiation Using Network Clustering Algorithms.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) technologies provide unprecedented resolution representing transcriptomics at the level of single cell. One of the biggest challenges in scRNA-seq data analysis is the cell type annotation, which is usually inferred by cell separation approaches. In-silico algorithms that accurately identify individual cell types in ongoing single-cell sequencing studies are crucial for unlocking cellular heterogeneity and understanding the biological basis of diseases. In this study, we focus on robustly identifying cell types in single-cell RNA sequencing data; we conduct a comparative analysis using methods established in biology, like Seurat, Leiden, and WGCNA, as well as Infomap, statistical inference via Stochastic Block Models (SBM), and single-cell Graph Neural Networks (scGNN). We also analyze preprocessing pipelines to identify and optimize key components in the process. Leveraging two independent datasets, PBMC and ROSMAP, we employ clustering algorithms on cell-cell networks derived from gene expression data. Our findings reveal that while clusters detected by WGCNA exhibit limited correspondence with cell types, those identified by multiresolution Infomap and Leiden, and SBM show a closer alignment, with Infomap standing out as a particularly effective approach. Infomap notably offers valuable insights for the precise characterization of cellular landscapes related to neurodegenration and immunology in scRNA-seq.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.