SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Predicting cancer-related mycobiome aspects in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The gut mycobiome and inter-kingdom microbial networks are linked to COPD severity in lung cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Oral-Gastric Microbial Axis in Gastric Cancer: Mechanisms Underlying Development and Progression.Cancers · 2026Review
- Interkingdom microbiome physiology in colorectal cancer: barrier dysfunction, immune-metabolic signaling, and therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colonization of the human gut and tumor tissue by non-pathogenic fungi has emerged as a potential risk factor associated with cancer epidemics. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess the role of fungal colonization in gastrointestinal (GI) tumors in increasing diagnostic efficiency. Methods: A PubMed citation search was conducted for publications up to and including March 2023, followed by full-text screening. Results were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. According to the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework, patients diagnosed with early-and advanced-stage GI cancers, GI adenoma patients, and healthy subjects were included with metagenomic (MG) or internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing on tumor tissue, adjacent normal tissue, stool, and blood samples. Results: Fourteen studies were eligible based on the inclusion criteria and methodological quality. Studies were conducted in stool ( Conclusion: In conclusion, the advent of highly sensitive sequencing methods may aid in the identification and the differentiation of cancerous from healthy human fungal colonizations with potential future diagnostic applications. Further studies are needed to establish reliable biomarkers for GI cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.