ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2024
Title: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Parental Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Management of Childhood Obesity.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health complaints, social impacts, and perceived care effectiveness reported by children with obesity and their parents: a prospective observational study in the Obesity Center CGG cohort.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- "Let me take the lead": Qualitative Findings From the Parent-Preferred Topics for Childhood Obesity Study.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Parental perceptions and self-efficacy in managing childhood obesity: a cross-sectional study from Türkiye.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Childhood obesity is a global epidemic affecting millions worldwide. Children living with obesity face increased risks of health-related and psychosocial problems extending into adulthood. Parents and carers play a crucial role in cultivating healthy habits in their children. This review aims to synthesize qualitative research on parental perceptions, motivators, and barriers in managing childhood obesity and their views on weight management programs. Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A variety of electronic databases were explored for qualitative studies published between 2006 and 2023. The CASP checklist was employed to assess the quality of the studies. Data extraction and synthesis were carried out utilizing thematic content analysis. Results: The search identified 20 peer-reviewed studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Key themes were mapped into five distinct groups: perceptions, facilitators and barriers influencing the management of childhood obesity, as well as facilitators and barriers to enrolment into a weight management program. Parents often perceived obesity as a temporary condition, genetically determined and believed it should not be considered as a major health concern. Identified facilitators included the restriction of screen time, school involvement, goal setting, and enhanced child-parent communication. Conversely, barriers included lack of child motivation, peer influence, easy access to junk food, as well as parental denial, insufficient knowledge or control and logistical challenges. Conclusion: To tackle childhood obesity, it is essential to adopt a comprehensive strategy that fosters a supportive family environment. Successful initiatives should encompass nutritional education for both parents and children, increase access to healthy food choices, implement home-based programs, and improve the infrastructure that encourages physical activity. Additionally, cultural factors and technological advancements should be considered when designing these interventions. Systematic Review Registration Number: PROSPERO (CRD42024514219).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.