ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Novel statistically equivalent signature-based hybrid feature selection and ensemble deep learning LSTM and GRU for chronic kidney disease classification.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modelling for Precision Dosing of Immunosuppressants in Kidney Transplantation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Explainable AI for Chronic Kidney Disease Prediction in Medical IoT: Integrating GANs and Few-Shot Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) involves numerous variables, but only a few significantly impact the classification task. The statistically equivalent signature (SES) method, inspired by constraint-based learning of Bayesian networks, is employed to identify essential features in CKD. Unlike conventional feature selection methods, which typically focus on a single set of features with the highest predictive potential, the SES method can identify multiple predictive feature subsets with similar performance. However, most feature selection (FS) classifiers perform suboptimally with strongly correlated data. The FS approach faces challenges in identifying crucial features and selecting the most effective classifier, particularly in high-dimensional data. This study proposes using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) in conjunction with the SES method for feature selection in CKD identification. Following this, an ensemble deep-learning model combining long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks is proposed for CKD classification. The features selected by the hybrid feature selection method are fed into the ensemble deep-learning model. The model's performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. The experimental results are compared with individual classifiers, including decision tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and support vector machine (SVM). The findings indicate a 2% improvement in classification accuracy when using the proposed hybrid feature selection method combined with the LSTM and GRU ensemble deep-learning model. Further analysis reveals that certain features, such as HEMO, POT, bacteria, and coronary artery disease, contribute minimally to the classification task. Future research could explore additional feature selection methods, including dynamic feature selection that adapts to evolving datasets and incorporates clinical knowledge to enhance CKD classification accuracy further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.