Evidence mapPaperPMID 39678455Full record

ReviewPostepy psychiatrii neurologii2024

Communication issues in co-occurring ADHD and autism spectrum disorders. Evaluative approaches and targeted interventions: mini review.

Maria Theodoratou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria TheodoratouSchool of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-4643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This mini-review presents strategies for assessing and treating communication difficulties in individuals with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Standardized assessments such as the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals and the Test of Language Development provide quantitative insights, while pragmatic tools, such as the Pragmatic Language Skills Inventory and the Social Communication Questionnaire provide qualitative measures of social communication skills. A comprehensive assessment also integrates clinical interviews, multi-contextual observations. Views: A multifaceted approach tailored to individual needs is required to effectively treat communication difficulties. Evidence suggests benefits from social skills training, structured group therapy sessions, and speech and language therapy focusing on expressive, receptive, and pragmatic language skills. Augmentative and alternative communication systems provide support for individuals with limited verbal skills. In addition, the development of supportive academic frameworks, such as Individualized Education Programs or Individualized Accommodation Plans, involves environmental modifications and collaborative educational planning including psychologists, educators, and families. Conclusions: Comorbid ADHD and ASD significantly impair communication, necessitating precise evaluation and multimodal interventions such as social skills training and augmentative and alternative communication tools. Collaborative, evidence-based approaches enhance functional outcomes and quality of life in affected individuals.

Indexed as

ADHDASDaugmentative and alternative communicationcommunication disorderscomprehensive assessmentmini-reviewmultimodal treatmentsocial skills trainingspeech therapy

Identifiers

PMID39678455
PMCPMC11635427

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.