Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39679302›Full record

ReviewRheumatology advances in practice2024

First contact physiotherapists: are they able to reduce the burden on rheumatology services? A critical review of the evidence base.

Sarah R Golding, Jo Jackson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah R GoldingSchool of Sport Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9094-5486
Jo JacksonSchool of Sport Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First contact practitioners have emerged over recent years in response to growing pressures within the National Health Service (NHS) and are now central to primary care musculoskeletal (MSK) services. Within the MSK field, these allied health professionals can be from a range of disciplines, including physiotherapy, podiatry and osteopathy. Early referral to rheumatology is key to successful long-term management of many inflammatory MSK conditions, but presents challenges to overburdened services. Evidence supporting the recognition and referral of patients with rheumatological disorders by First Contact Practitioners is lacking; however, physiotherapists have been shown successfully to substitute the role of a doctor within the MSK field. This review investigates the value of First Contact Physiotherapists (FCPs) within primary care and their role in early recognition and referral of rheumatological MSK disorders in line with national guidance. FCPs best placed to fulfil the role of MSK champions, positively impacting the whole MSK pathway, with the potential to reduce the burden on rheumatology services. Planned rapid upscaling of FCPs over the next few years will support sustainability of MSK NHS services.

Indexed as

early referralfirst contact physiotherapyprimary carerheumatology

Identifiers

PMID39679302
PMCPMC11640505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.