SynthesisAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2025
Meta-Analysis of Transcriptomic Studies of Blood and Six Brain Regions Identifies a Consensus of 15 Cross-Tissue Mechanisms in Alzheimer's Disease and Suggests an Origin of Cross-Study Heterogeneity.
Synthesis in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicted brain-regional gene expression patterns in individuals living with Alzheimer's disease.Neurobiology of aging · 2026Article
- Alzheimer's Disease as a Multi-Layer Network Disorder: A Systems Biology Framework Integrating Multi-Omics Mechanisms.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Functionally informed annotation influences pathway-specific polygenic risk and disease inference in Alzheimer's disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The comprehensive genome-wide nature of transcriptome studies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) should provide a reliable description of disease molecular states. However, the genes and molecular systems nominated by transcriptomic studies do not always overlap. Even when results do align, it is not clear if those observations represent true consensus across many studies. A couple of sources of variation have been proposed to explain this variability, including tissue-of-origin and cohort type, but its basis remains uncertain. To address this variability and extract reliable results, we utilized all publicly available blood or brain transcriptomic datasets of AD, comprised of 24 brain studies with 4007 samples from six different brain regions, and eight blood studies with 1566 samples. We identified a consensus of AD-associated genes across brain regions and AD-associated gene-sets across blood and brain, generalizable machine learning and linear scoring classifiers, and significant contributors to biological diversity in AD datasets. While AD-associated genes did not significantly overlap between blood and brain, our findings highlighted 15 dysregulated processes shared across blood and brain in AD. The top five most significantly dysregulated processes were DNA replication, metabolism of proteins, protein localization, cell cycle, and programmed cell death. Conversely, addressing the discord across studies, we found that large-scale gene co-regulation patterns can account for a significant fraction of variability in AD datasets. Overall, this study ranked and characterized a compilation of genes and molecular systems consistently identified across a large assembly of AD transcriptome studies in blood and brain, providing potential candidate biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.