ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Interpretable deep learning survival predictions in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Characterization of 98 Chinese Cases of Genetic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease With T188K Mutation.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: Diagnostic Value, Limitations, and Future Multi-Omics Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Interpretable deep learning survival predictions in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) is a rapidly progressive and fatal prion disease with significant public health implications. Survival is heterogenous, posing challenges for prognostication and care planning. We developed a survival model using diagnostic data from comprehensive UK sCJD surveillance.
methodsUsing national CJD surveillance data from the United Kingdom (UK), we included 655 cases of probable or definite sCJD according to 2017 international consensus diagnostic criteria between 01/2017 and 01/2022. Data included symptoms at diagnosis, CSF RT-QuIC and 14-3-3, MRI and EEG findings, as well as sex, age, PRNP codon 129 polymorphism, CSF total protein and S100b. An artificial neural network based multitask logistic regression was used for survival analysis. Model-agnostic interpretation methods was used to assess the contribution of individual features on model outcome.
resultsOur algorithm had a c-index of 0.732, IBS of 0.079, and AUC at 5 and 10 months of 0.866 and 0.872, respectively. This modestly improved on Cox proportional hazard model (c-index 0.730, IBS 0.083, AUC 0.852 and 0863) but was not statistically significant. Both models identified codon 129 polymorphism and CSF 14-3-3 to be significant predictive features.
conclusionssCJD survival can be predicted using routinely collected clinical data at diagnosis. Our analysis pipeline has similar levels of performance to classical methods and provide clinically meaningful interpretation which help deepen clinical understanding of the condition. Further development and clinical validation will facilitate improvements in prognostication, care planning, and stratification to clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.