Observational studyJournal of neurology2024
Risk factors of long-term brain health outcomes after hospitalization for critical illness.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain health may be impaired years after hospitalization for critical illness, and similar impairments occur after hospitalization for COVID-19. However, it remains unclear which patients are most likely to experience long-term brain health consequences and whether these adverse events differ between non-COVID critical illness and COVID-19.
methodsIn a prospective observational study, we enrolled patients hospitalized for (1) non-COVID critical illness (pneumonia, myocardial infarction, or ICU-requiring conditions) or for (2) COVID-19, from March 2020 to June 2021. Brain health was assessed at 18-month follow-up with cognitive, psychiatric, and neurological tests. We used both logistic regression and prediction models to test for associations between different variables and brain health.
resultsWe included 245 patients: 125 hospitalized for non-COVID critical illness and 120 for COVID-19 [mean age 61.2 (± 13.6) years, 42% women]. Brain health was impaired in 76% of patients (72% critical illness, 81% COVID-19; p = 0.14) at 18-month follow-up. The strongest predictive factors associated with impaired brain health were education < 13 years, age ≥ 70 years, and neuroticism traits in the best performing model (AUC = 0.63). When analyzing non-COVID critical illness and COVID-19 patients separately, low education was one of the few factors associated with impaired brain health in both groups (AUCs for best models: 0.66 and 0.69).
conclusionBrain health is comparably impaired after hospitalization for critical illness and COVID-19. Factors like higher age, lower education and neuroticism may help identifying vulnerable individuals, who could benefit from close monitoring to improve brain health after critical illness, regardless of the underlying disease etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39680217What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.