ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Two novel variants in GRN: the relevance of CNV analysis and genetic screening in FTLD patients with a negative family history.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective TMEM106B-rs3173615 delays age at onset in GRN mutation carriers.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- A single-cell, long-read, isoform-resolved case-control study of FTD reveals cell-type-specific and broad splicing dysregulation in human brain.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Genetic Correlates of Presenile Dementia and Cognitive Decline in the Armenian Population Following COVID-19: A Case-Control Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is one of the leading causes of early onset dementia. Pathogenic variants in GRN have been reported to cause 5-25% of familial and 5% of sporadic FTLD. Here, we present two novel, likely pathogenic variants in GRN.
methodsFour patients from four different families underwent whole exome sequencing (WES) with additional copy-number variance (CNV) analysis in a clinical setting. TMEM106B rs1990622 and rs3173615 SNPs and 3'UTR insertion were tested in one presymptomatic carrier. In three probands and one presymptomatic carrier, plasma progranulin (PGRN) levels were measured using a specific ELISA kit. In two probands, neuropathological diagnosis was established using current neuropathological criteria.
resultsThrough CNV analysis on WES data, we identified a partial deletion, NM_002087.2 (GRN):c.1179 + 104_1536delinsCTGA, p.(?), in three patients with primary progressive aphasia and/or corticobasal syndrome. Haplotype analysis revealed a shared haplotype block, suggesting that the deletion represents a founder mutation. Additionally, we found a novel, missense variant, NM_002087.2 (GRN):c.23 T > A, p.(Val8Glu), in one proband with a negative family history. The proband's unaffected parent-in their 80 s-carried the same variant, yet was homozygous for the TMEM106B risk haplotype. The pathogenicity of both GRN variants was supported by typical neuropathological features and reduced PGRN levels.
conclusionWe recommend a thorough genetic screening, including CNV analysis, for both familial and apparent sporadic FTLD patients. Furthermore, the presymptomatic carrier homozygous for the TMEM106B risk haplotype exemplifies the presence of other protective factors that modify disease onset and urges caution in genetic counselling based on the TMEM106B haplotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.