ArticleJAMA pediatrics2025
Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in Pregnancies With Major Fetal Congenital Heart Defects.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Placental Dysfunction and Congenital Heart Disease: Investigating the Placenta-Heart Axis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Understanding the risk profile of obstetric complications in pregnancies with fetal major congenital heart defects (MCHDs) is crucial for obstetric counseling and care. Objective: To investigate the risk of placenta-related adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal MCHDs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study retrieved data from June 1, 2008, to June 1, 2018, from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database, which includes comprehensive data on more than 95% of all pregnancies in Denmark since the database was instituted in 2008. All singleton pregnancies that resulted in a live-born child after 24 weeks' gestation without chromosomal aberrations were included. A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 1, 2024, to compile existing knowledge and data on adverse obstetric outcomes among MCHD subtypes. Exposure: Fetal MCHDs including 1 of 11 subtypes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite adverse obstetric outcome defined as preeclampsia, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes consisted of each adverse obstetric event. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were computed using generalized estimating equations adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, smoking, and year of delivery. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to pool effect sizes for each MCHD subtype and adverse obstetric outcome. Results: A total of 534 170 pregnancies were included in the Danish cohort, including 745 with isolated fetal MCHDs (median [IQR] maternal age, 29.0 [26.0-33.0] years) and 533 425 without MCHDs (median [IQR] maternal age, 30.0 [26.0-33.0] years). Pregnancies with fetal MCHDs exhibited a higher rate of adverse obstetric outcomes at 22.8% compared with 9.0% in pregnancies without fetal MCHDs (AOR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.49-3.53). Preeclampsia (AOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.33-2.51), preterm birth at less than 37 weeks (AOR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.15-4.71), and fetal growth restriction (AOR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.42-4.38) occurred significantly more frequently in pregnancies with MCHDs. Except for fetal transposition of the great arteries (AOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.66-2.15), all MCHD subtypes carried a greater risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. The meta-analysis included 10 additional studies that supported these results. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that nearly 1 in 4 women expecting a child with an MCHD, except transposition of the great arteries, may be at high risk of adverse obstetric outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.