Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39681669›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2025

AI models in clinical neonatology: a review of modeling approaches and a consensus proposal for standardized reporting of model performance.

Ameena Husain, Lindsey Knake, Brynne Sullivan, James Barry, Kristyn Beam, Emma Holmes, Thomas Hooven, Ryan McAdams, Alvaro Moreira, Wissam Shalish and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Pediatrics 4.0: the Transformative Impacts of the Latest Industrial Revolution on Pediatrics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ameena Husain *Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. ameena.husain@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-7235
Lindsey Knake *Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Brynne Sullivan *Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
James BarryDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kristyn BeamDepartment of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Emma HolmesDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas HoovenDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ryan McAdamsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Alvaro MoreiraDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Wissam ShalishDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Zachary VesoulisDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Predictive Informatics Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care UnitR01HD072071 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KAREN D FAIRCHILD, Brynne Archer Sullivan · 2014 to 2026
$7.6M
POWS for NOWS: Using physiomarkers as an objective tool for assessing the withdrawing infantR18EB035019 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SULLIVAN, BRYNNE ARCHER, VESOULIS, ZACHARY ANDREW · 2023 to 2023
$3.1M
Racial Disparities in Preterm Brain Injury Are Driven by Differences in Cerebral AutoregulationK23NS111086 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VESOULIS, ZACHARY ANDREW · 2019 to 2022
$736k
Genomic determinants of bronchopulmonary dysplasia development in humans and an animal modelK23HD101701 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI MOREIRA, ALVARO G · 2021 to 2024
$652k
NIBIB NIH HHS R18 EB035019NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD101701NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072071NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS111086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly advancing area with growing clinical applications in healthcare. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) produces large amounts of multidimensional data allowing AI and machine learning (ML) new avenues to improve early diagnosis, enhance monitoring, and provide highly-targeted treatment approaches. In this article, we review recent clinical applications of AI to important neonatal problems, including sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and others. For each clinical area, we highlight a variety of ML models published in the literature and examine the future role they may play at the bedside. While the development of these models is rapidly expanding, a fundamental understanding of model selection, development, and performance evaluation is crucial for researchers and healthcare providers alike. As AI plays an increasing role in daily practice, understanding the implications of AI design and performance will enable more effective implementation. We provide a comprehensive explanation of the AI development process and recommendations for a standardized performance metric framework. Additionally, we address critical challenges, including model generalizability, ethical considerations, and the need for rigorous performance monitoring to avoid model drift. Finally, we outline future directions, emphasizing the importance of collaborative efforts and equitable access to AI innovations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeonatologyConsensus Statements as TopicHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMachine LearningRetinopathy of Prematurity

Identifiers

PMID39681669
PMCPMC12961963

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.