ReviewCancers2024
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Stimulated Raman Histology: New Frontiers in Vibrational Tissue Imaging.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Broadband Coherent Raman Scattering: Excitation Architectures and Operating Regimes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancements in nanobiosensors for early cancer detection, challenges, treatment, and future prospects: a comprehensive review.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: navigating the new frontier of precision uro-oncology.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2025Review
- Non-invasive applications of Raman spectroscopy in assisted reproduction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Stimulated Raman Histology as a Novel Method for Pathologic Examination of Urothelial Carcinoma With Unprocessed, Fresh Bladder Cancer Tissue.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frozen section biopsy, introduced in the early 1900s, still remains the gold standard methodology for rapid histologic evaluations. Although a valuable tool, it is labor-, time-, and cost-intensive. Other challenges include visual and diagnostic variability, which may complicate interpretation and potentially compromise the quality of clinical decisions. Raman spectroscopy, with its high specificity and non-invasive nature, can be an effective tool for dependable and quick histopathology. The most promising modality in this context is stimulated Raman histology (SRH), a label-free, non-linear optical process which generates conventional H&E-like images in short time frames. SRH overcomes limitations of conventional Raman scattering by leveraging the qualities of stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), wherein the energy gets transferred from a high-power pump beam to a probe beam, resulting in high-energy, high-intensity scattering. SRH's high resolution and non-requirement of preprocessing steps make it particularly suitable when it comes to intrasurgical histology. Combining SRH with artificial intelligence (AI) can lead to greater precision and less reliance on manual interpretation, potentially easing the burden of the overburdened global histopathology workforce. We review the recent applications and advances in SRH and how it is tapping into AI to evolve as a revolutionary tool for rapid histologic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.