ReviewCancers2024
Performing High-Quality Sublobar Resections: Key Differences Between Wedge Resection and Segmentectomy.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Surgical technique for minimally invasive segmentectomies of the right lung: anatomic rationale for a posterior approach.Journal of visualized surgery · 2026Article
- Research advances of tubeless thoracic surgery for pulmonary nodules: current status and future challenges.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Outcomes After VATS Single Versus Multiple Segmentectomy for cT1N0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Video-Assisted vs. Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques and Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The introduction of targeted treatments and immunotherapy in lung cancer has transformed patient care by offering "precision medicine" focused on the characteristics of the disease. The same concept has emerged in lung cancer surgery. This "precision surgery" aims to determine the best surgical approach based on the characteristics of the cancer, the patient's cardiorespiratory status, and technological advances in thoracic surgery. While lobectomy continues to be the gold standard for managing early-stage lung cancer, the implementation of screening programs has enabled the earlier detection of smaller tumors. In this context, sublobar resections, particularly segmentectomy, have emerged as valuable options in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. Recent studies suggest that sublobar resections, including segmentectomy and wedge resection, provide a viable alternative to lobectomy. This review explores the various resection strategies available, tailored to patient and tumor characteristics, and highlights modern preoperative techniques aimed at advancing precision surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.