ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Technique for Monitoring Mechanically Ventilated Patient Lung Conditions.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical ventilation is a critical but resource-intensive treatment. Automated tools are common in screening diagnostics, whereas real-time, continuous trend analysis in mechanical ventilation remains rare. Current techniques for monitoring lung conditions are often invasive, lack accuracy, and fail to isolate respiratory resistance-making them impractical for continuous monitoring and diagnosis. To address this challenge, we propose an automated, non-invasive condition monitoring method to support pulmonologists.
methodsOur method leverages ventilation waveform time-series data in controlled modes to monitor lung conditions automatically and non-invasively on a breath-by-breath basis while accurately isolating respiratory resistance.
resultsUsing statistical classification and regression models, the approach achieves 99.1% accuracy for ventilation mode classification, 97.5% accuracy for feature extraction, and 99.0% for predicting mechanical lung parameters. The models are both computationally efficient (720 K predictions per second per core) and lightweight (24.5 MB).
conclusionsBy storing breath-by-breath predictions, pulmonologists can access a high-resolution trend of lung conditions, gaining clear insights into sudden changes without speculation and streamlining diagnosis and decision-making. The deployment of this solution could expand domain knowledge, enhance the understanding of patient conditions, and enable real-time dashboards for parallel monitoring, helping to prioritize patients and optimize resource use, which is especially valuable during pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.