ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Diagnostic Ability of Quantitative Parameters of Whole-Body Bone SPECT/CT Using a Full-Ring 360° Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Camera for Detecting Bone Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Whole-Body 360° CZT Bone SPECT/CT and Planar Bone Scintigraphy in Detecting Bone Metastasis in Small Cell Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A comparison of three-dimensional-ring CZT and NaI(Tl) single-photon emission computed tomography systems usingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of quantitative SPECT/CT integrated parameters for differentiating spinal tuberculosis from spinal metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Standardized uptake value-based analysis of two-phase whole-body bone tomoscintigraphies recorded with a high-speed 360° CZT camera in patients with known or suspected inflammatory arthritis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic capability of quantitative parameters from whole-body bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer patients; Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 82 prostate cancer patients who underwent staging bone scintigraphy with a full-ring 360° Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) SPECT/CT system. From the SPECT/CT images, we measured the maximum (SUVmax) and mean (SUVmean) standardized uptake values at six normal bone sites (skull, humerus, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, iliac bone, and femur), and the SUVmax for both metastatic and benign bone lesions. Ratios of lesion SUVmax-to-maximum and mean uptake values at the skull, humerus, and femur were computed for each lesion; Results: SUVmax and SUVmean at the skull and femur exhibited significantly lower variance compared to those at the thoracic spine, lumbar spine, and iliac bone, and revealed no significant differences between patients with and without bone metastasis. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for detecting bone metastasis among 482 metastatic lesions, 132 benign bone lesions, and 477 normal bone sites, the lesion-to-femur mean uptake ratio demonstrated the highest area under the curve value (0.955) among SPECT/CT parameters. Using a cut-off value of 5.38, the lesion-to-femur mean uptake ratio achieved a sensitivity of 94.8% and a specificity of 86.5%; Conclusions: The bone lesion-to-femur mean uptake ratio was the most effective quantitative bone SPECT/CT parameter for detecting bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Quantitative analysis of bone SPECT/CT images could thus play a crucial role in diagnosing bone metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.