ReviewCells2024
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Imaging Dementia.
Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' Perspectives on the Implementation of AI in Radiological Diagnostics: Focus Group Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Advances in AI-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using MRI: a comprehensive survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Deep learning for Alzheimer's disease: advances in classification, segmentation, subtyping, and explainability.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in PET Imaging for Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- AI driven network pharmacology: Multi-scale mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine from molecular to patient analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Construction and Interpretability of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model of Electronystagmography-Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Early Screening of Alzheimer's Disease.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly population (aged 65 years and over), followed by vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, and rare types of neurodegenerative diseases, including frontotemporal dementia. There is an unmet need to improve diagnosis and prognosis for patients with dementia, as cycles of misdiagnosis and diagnostic delays are challenging scenarios in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuroimaging is routinely used in clinical practice to support the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Clinical neuroimaging is amenable to errors owing to varying human judgement as the imaging data are complex and multidimensional. Artificial intelligence algorithms (machine learning and deep learning) enable automation of neuroimaging interpretation and may reduce potential bias and ameliorate clinical decision-making. Graph convolutional network-based frameworks implicitly provide multimodal sparse interpretability to support the detection of Alzheimer's disease and its prodromal stage, mild cognitive impairment. In patients with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, radiologists had significantly better detection performances with both ARIA-E (sensitivity higher in the assisted/deep learning method [87%] compared to unassisted [71%]) and for ARIA-H signs (sensitivity was higher in assisted [79%] compared to unassisted [69%]). A convolutional neural network method was developed, and external validation predicted final clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease, or cognitively normal with FDG-PET. The translation of artificial intelligence to clinical practice is plagued with technical, disease-related, and institutional challenges. The implementation of artificial intelligence methods in clinical practice has the potential to transform the diagnostic and treatment landscape and improve patient health and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.