ReviewCells2024
Towards Clinical Application: Calcium Waves for In Vitro Qualitative Assessment of Propagated Primary Human Corneal Endothelial Cells.
Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Old drug with new application: spironolactone suppresses Panx 1-mediated CaInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Bioartificial human corneas generated by tissue engineering. A historical and technical review.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
- Protocol for Cryopreservation of Endothelial Monolayers: An Update.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- The trio of Candida albicans, immune cells, and cancer progression: a complex interplay driving tumorigenesis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Mechanical Modulation, Physiological Roles, and Imaging Innovations of Intercellular Calcium Waves in Living Systems.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal endothelium cells (CECs) regulate corneal hydration between the leaky barrier of the corneal endothelium and the ionic pumps on the surface of CECs. As CECs do not regenerate, loss of CECs leads to poor vision and corneal blindness. Corneal transplant is the only treatment option; however, there is a severe shortage of donor corneas globally. Cell therapy using propagated primary human CECs is an alternative approach to corneal transplantations, and proof of functionality is crucial for validating such CECs. Expression markers like Na-K-ATPase and ZO-1 are typical but not specific to CECs. Assessing the barrier function of the expanded CECs via electrical resistance (i.e., TEER and Ussing's chamber) involves difficult techniques and is thus impractical for clinical application. Calcium has been demonstrated to affect the paracellular permeability of the corneal endothelium. Its absence alters morphology and disrupts apical junctions in bovine CECs, underscoring its importance. Calcium signaling patterns such as calcium waves affect the rate of wound healing in bovine CECs. Therefore, observing calcium waves in expanded CECs could provide valuable insights into their health and functional integrity. Mechanical or chemical stimulations, combined with Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.