ArticleNutrients2024
Nutritional Inequality and Co-Morbid Chronic Disease Among Breast Cancer Survivors in China.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesBreast cancer survivors often face an elevated risk of developing co-morbid chronic diseases, which may be exacerbated by nutritional inequalities. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the associations between nutrition literacy, dietary quality, and the risk of co-morbidity in breast cancer survivors in China.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer survivors enrolled in the Shanghai Cancer Rehabilitation Club from March to July 2023. The multivariable models of logistic regression, Poisson regression, and mediation analysis were used to explore the relationship between nutrition literacy, dietary quality, and co-morbid chronic diseases among breast cancer survivors in China.
resultsThe mean age of the 1552 female breast cancer survivors was 64.5 ± 7.02 years. Nutrition literacy was found to be low, with 49.81% of participants scoring above the threshold for adequate nutrition literacy. The median (IQR) diet quality distance, low bound score, and high bound score were 67.0 (55.0, 81.0), -39.0 (-51.0, -28.0), and 25.0 (16.0, 36.0), respectively. Of the total female breast cancer survivors, 67.27% were reported to have at least one comorbid chronic disease. Hypertension (37.32%) was the most common co-morbid chronic disease. Each score increase of 10 in nutrition literacy (AOR 0.88, 95%CI 0.808-0.962) was associated with a significant reduction in co-morbid chronic disease risk among breast cancer survivors. Poisson regression analysis of the number of chronic diseases was conducted, and consistently, an association between higher nutrition literacy levels and fewer chronic diseases was observed (AOR 0.94, 95%CI 0.911-0.971). The indirect effect of nutrition literacy on comorbidity risk through dietary quality was not significant (indirect effect = 0.994, 95%CI = 0.980-1.008).
conclusionsNutrition literacy is paramount in breast cancer survivors' dietary quality and prognosis. Enhancing nutrition literacy may be a crucial strategy for improving dietary quality and mitigating the risk of comorbid chronic diseases in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.