SynthesisNutrients2024
Impact of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Treatment on the Nutritional Status of Paediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Best evidence summary of dietary management during chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the most prevalent cancer in childhood and is one of the leading causes of death annually. Antineoplastic treatments are associated with a high risk of malnutrition, which is important for continuous growth and development.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of these treatments on the nutritional status of paediatric patients with ALL. Data were collected from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method. All the studies in which nutritional status was assessed in human beings diagnosed with ALL up to 18 years and published in English or Spanish between January 1900 and December 2023 were included.
resultsA total of 18 articles and 1692 participants were analysed in this review. Article quality was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. This systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024505111). ALL treatment has a negative impact on the nutritional status of these patients and played an important role in their growth and global development. ALL treatments can modify hunger perception and the palatability of food.
conclusionsNutritional status is important for patient prognosis and survival. Nutritional evaluation, a specific nutritional assessment, and follow-up should be recommended for these patients to decrease the nutritional impact on global health. More homogeneous studies must be conducted to reach robust conclusions regarding the best type of nutritional intervention for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.