ReviewNutrients2024
Probiotics in the Prophylaxis of Premature Rupture of Membranes and Cervical Incompetence.
Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of cervical microbiome in cervical incompetence: insights from 16 S rRNA metagenomic sequencing.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Interaction of vaginal microbiota and biomarkers in Premature rupture of membranes: from bench to beside.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Dynamic changes in the pregnancy microbiome and their role in preterm birth.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and cervical incompetence (CI) are major contributors to preterm birth, a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. BACKGROUND/
objectivesDisorders of the vaginal microbiota, such as bacterial vaginosis, have been associated with an increased risk of PROM, CI, and subsequent preterm birth. Probiotics, particularly Lactobacillus strains, have been proposed as a preventive strategy to restore and maintain a healthy vaginal microbiome. This review aims to summarize the latest evidence on the role of probiotics in the prevention of PROM and CI.
methodsA comprehensive review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotic interventions in the prevention of PROM and CI, yielding 1809 records from 2005 to 2024. Seven relevant studies were selected by searching medical databases and focusing on studies that investigated the restoration of healthy vaginal flora, the reduction of pathogenic bacteria colonization, and the modulation of immune responses by probiotics.
resultsThe studies analyzed suggest that probiotics may help restore healthy vaginal flora, reduce pathogenic bacterial colonization, and modulate immune responses, thereby reducing the risk of membrane rupture and cervical insufficiency. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies shows that the use of probiotics is associated with a lower incidence of PROM and preterm birth, especially in high-risk groups.
conclusionsProbiotics emerge as a potential non-invasive and cost-effective strategy to improve pregnancy outcomes in women at risk of preterm birth due to PROM. According to our research, probiotic prophylaxis of cervical insufficiency has not yet been sufficiently investigated. Despite the promising findings, further research is needed to determine standardized probiotic formulations, optimal timing, and routes of administration. Personalized probiotic therapies may represent the future of preterm birth prevention as they offer targeted interventions based on individual microbiome composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.