Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39683634›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Gut Microbiota: Association with Fiber Intake, Ultra-Processed Food Consumption, Sex, Body Mass Index, and Socioeconomic Status in Medical Students.

Laura Moreno-Altamirano, Karina Robles-Rivera, Hugo G Castelán-Sánchez, Felipe Vaca-Paniagua, María Del Carmen Iñarritu Pérez, Sandra Elvia Hernández-Valencia, Carlos Cruz-Casarrubias, Juan José García-García, Miguel Ruíz de la Cruz, Héctor Martínez-Gregorio and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Laura Moreno-AltamiranoPublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Avenida Universidad 3000, Copilco, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Karina Robles-RiveraResearch Department, Secretariat of Clinical Education, Medical Internship and Social Service, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Avenida Universidad 3000, Copilco Universidad, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0005-3920-5980
Hugo G Castelán-SánchezDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, Dental Sciences Building, Rm. 4044, London, Ontario N6A 5C1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4763-0267
Felipe Vaca-PaniaguaLaboratorio Nacional en Salud, Diagnóstico Molecular y Efecto Ambiental en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico.
María Del Carmen Iñarritu PérezPublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Avenida Universidad 3000, Copilco, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Sandra Elvia Hernández-ValenciaNational Institute of Rehabilitation Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada Mexico-Xochimilco 289, Arenal de Guadalupe, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14389, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8232-1585
Carlos Cruz-CasarrubiasCenter for Nutrition and Health Research, Mexican National Institute of Public Health, Fray Pedro de Gante 12, Belisario Domínguez Sección 16, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9972-4302
Juan José García-GarcíaPublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Avenida Universidad 3000, Copilco, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Miguel Ruíz de la CruzUnidad de Investigación en Biomedicina, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2267-6138
Héctor Martínez-GregorioLaboratorio Nacional en Salud, Diagnóstico Molecular y Efecto Ambiental en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico.
Clara Estela Díaz VelásquezLaboratorio Nacional en Salud, Diagnóstico Molecular y Efecto Ambiental en Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico.
Guadalupe Soto-EstradaPublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Avenida Universidad 3000, Copilco, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Armando Navarro-OcañaPublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Avenida Universidad 3000, Copilco, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6693-7168
Santiago Carrillo-MedinaCentro de Investigación Trials in Medicine S.C., Avenida Álvaro Obregón 121 Floor 15 Suite 1504, Cuauhtemoc, Mexico City 06700, Mexico.

Funding

UNAM-PAPIIT IN219823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a vital role in various physical and physiological processes, including immune system regulation, neurotransmitter production, inflammatory response modulation, and the inhibition of pathogenic organisms. An imbalance in the microbial community, known as dysbiosis, has been associated with numerous health issues. Biological influences, health behaviors, socioeconomic determinants, and nutritional status can disrupt this balance.

objectiveTo evaluate the differences in the gut microbiota composition in medical students according to fiber intake, ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption, sex, body mass index, and socioeconomic status.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 91 medical students, and 82 fecal samples were analyzed. Sociodemographic and dietary data were collected via questionnaires, UPF consumption was assessed using the NOVA classification, and trained nutritionists performed anthropometry. DNA extraction and 16S rRNA sequencing were performed for the microbial analysis. Bioinformatics and statistical tests included the Dunn and Kruskal-Wallis tests, a PCoA analysis, PERMANOVA, ANOVA, Spearman's rank correlation, and alpha and beta diversity metrics.

resultsDietary fiber intake strongly influences gut microbiota composition. Lower fiber intake was associated with a higher prevalence of

conclusionsThis study highlights the significant impact of diet, particularly fiber intake and UPF, on gut microbiota composition, emphasizing the importance of dietary habits in maintaining gut health.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexDietary FiberFast FoodsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDietFecesFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood, ProcessedHumansMaleSex FactorsSocial ClassDietary Fiberdietfiber intakegut microbiotamedical studentobesityoverweightsocioeconomic statusultra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID39683634
PMCPMC11644225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.