ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Should We Consider Neurodegeneration by Itself or in a Triangulation with Neuroinflammation and Demyelination? The Example of Multiple Sclerosis and Beyond.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic evaluation of artocarpin-enriched extract from Artocarpus heterophyllus heartwood in multiple sclerosis rat model.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Dual-Targeting miR-219 and miR-146a in Multiple Sclerosis: Bridging Myelin Repair and Neuroinflammation for Novel Therapeutic Insights.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Asperuloside: an emerging therapeutic candidate for Parkinson's disease through molecular mechanistic insights.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- From Molecules to Models: miRNAs and Advanced Human Platforms of Neurodegeneration and Repair in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Systemic Neurodegeneration and Brain Aging: Multi-Omics Disintegration, Proteostatic Collapse, and Network Failure Across the CNS.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Neuroprotective strategies in multiple sclerosis: a status update and emerging paradigms.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegeneration is preeminent in many neurological diseases, and still a major burden we fail to manage in patient's care. Its pathogenesis is complicated, intricate, and far from being completely understood. Taking multiple sclerosis as an example, we propose that neurodegeneration is neither a cause nor a consequence by itself. Mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to energy deficiency and ion imbalance, plays a key role in neurodegeneration, and is partly caused by the oxidative stress generated by microglia and astrocytes. Nodal and paranodal disruption, with or without myelin alteration, is further involved. Myelin loss exposes the axons directly to the inflammatory and oxidative environment. Moreover, oligodendrocytes provide a singular metabolic and trophic support to axons, but do not emerge unscathed from the pathological events, by primary myelin defects and cell apoptosis or secondary to neuroinflammation or axonal damage. Hereby, trophic failure might be an overlooked contributor to neurodegeneration. Thus, a complex interplay between neuroinflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration, wherein each is primarily and secondarily involved, might offer a more comprehensive understanding of the pathogenesis and help establishing novel therapeutic strategies for many neurological diseases and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.