ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Qualitative Transcriptional Signature for Predicting the Pathological Response of Colorectal Cancer to FOLFIRI Therapy.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic profiling identifies immunotherapy-responsive phenotypes in microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer.Oncogene · 2026Article
- Synergistic immunomodulation: integrating physical ablation with immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic colorectal carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
FOLFIRI (5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan) is the first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but response rates are under 50%. This study aimed to develop a predictive signature for FOLFIRI response in mCRC patients. Firstly, Spearman's rank correlation and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to select chemotherapy response genes and gene pairs, respectively. Then, an optimization procedure was used to determine the final signature. A predictive signature consisting of three gene pairs (3-GPS) was identified. In the training set, 3-GPS achieved an accuracy of 0.94. In a validation set of 60 samples, predicted responders had significantly better progression-free survival than the predicted non-responders (HR = 0.47,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.