ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Integrating Metabolomics Domain Knowledge with Explainable Machine Learning in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Classification.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic determinants of cancer immunotherapy outcomes identified by plasma profiling.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Volatile Fingerprinting and Interpretable Machine Learning for Quality Differentiation of Astragali Radix from Different Cultivation Patterns.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metabolomic Classification of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome via Explainable Ensemble Learning and Pareto-Guided Feature Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Metabolic characteristics of poultry eggs from five species: insights from metabolomics, network analysis, and machine learning.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy-Based Metabolomics in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Challenges, Methodological Advances and Translational Considerations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unraveling Atherosclerosis through Multi-omics: Systematic Insights into the Unique Applications and Clinical Perspectives.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Inflammatory, Nutritional, and Atherogenic Profiles Associated with Histologic Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Potential of Metabolomic and Proteomic Biomarkers in Cardiology-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The Relationship Between Composite Inflammatory Indices and Dry Eye in Hashimoto's Disease-Induced Hypothyroid Patients.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Relationship between amino acid metabolism and inflammation in coronary heart disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolomic data often present challenges due to high dimensionality, collinearity, and variability in metabolite concentrations. Machine learning (ML) application in metabolomic analyses is enabling the extraction of meaningful information from complex data. Bringing together domain-specific knowledge from metabolomics with explainable ML methods can refine the predictive performance and interpretability of models used in atherosclerosis research. In this work, we aimed to identify the most impactful metabolites associated with the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in cross-sectional case-control studies using explainable ML methods integrated with metabolomics domain knowledge. For this, a subset from the FLEMENGHO cohort with metabolomic data available was used as the training cohort, including 63 patients with a history of ASCVD and 52 non-smoking controls matched by age, sex, and body mass index from the same population. First, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) was applied for dimensionality reduction. The selected metabolites' correlations were analyzed by considering their chemical categorization. Then, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was used to identify metabolites that characterize ASCVD. Next, the selected metabolites were evaluated in an external cohort to determine their effectiveness in distinguishing between cases and controls. A total of 56 metabolites were selected for ASCVD discrimination using PLS-DA. The primary identified metabolites' superclasses included lipids, organic acids, and organic oxygen compounds. Upon integrating these metabolites with the XGBoost model, the classification yielded a test area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75. SHAP analyses ranked cholesterol, 3-methylhistidine, and glucuronic acid among the most impactful features and showed the diversity of metabolites considered for building the ASCVD discriminator. Also using XGBoost, the selected metabolites achieved an AUC of 0.93 in an independent external validation cohort. In conclusion, the combination of different metabolites has the potential to build classifiers for ASCVD. Integrating metabolite categorization within the SHAP analysis further enhanced the interpretability of the model, offering insights into metabolite-specific contributions to ASCVD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.