ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Metabolomics-Based Machine Learning Models Accurately Predict Breast Cancer Estrogen Receptor Status.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Feature Selection: Interpretable Machine Learning for Mechanistic Insights in Metabolomics.Biology · 2026Review
- Salivary Antioxidant and Peroxidase Activity as a Marker of Steroid Hormone Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Metabolomics in cancer detection: A review of techniques, biomarkers, and clinical utility.BioMedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is a global concern as a leading cause of death for women. Early and precise diagnosis can be vital in handling the disease efficiently. Breast cancer subtyping based on estrogen receptor (ER) status is crucial for determining prognosis and treatment. This study uses metabolomics data from plasma samples to detect metabolite biomarkers that could distinguish ER-positive from ER-negative breast cancers in a non-invasive manner. The dataset includes demographic information, ER status, and metabolite levels from 188 breast cancer patients and 73 healthy controls. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) with a Random Forest (RF) classifier identified an optimal subset of 30 features-29 biomarkers and age-that achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC). To address the class imbalance, Gaussian noise-based augmentation and Adaptive Synthetic Oversampling (ADASYN) were applied, ensuring balanced representation during training. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms-Random Forest, Support Vector Classifier (SVC), XGBoost, and Logistic Regression (LR)-were evaluated using grid search. The Random Forest classifier emerged as the top performer, achieving an AUC of 0.95 and an accuracy of 93%. These results suggest that ML has great promise for identifying specific metabolites linked to ER expression, paving the development of a novel analytical tool that can minimize current challenges in identifying ER status, and improve the precision of breast cancer subtyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.